EPARulemakingEPA-HQ-OAR-2018-0295

Who commented on this docket

Response to CAA Section 126(b) Petitions from Delaware and Maryland

7 organizations filed 8 public comments on Response to CAA Section 126(b) Petitions from Delaware and Maryland, at the Environmental Protection Agency. The comment window closed 2927d ago.

Organizations
7
Comments
8
RIN
Comment window
closed 2927d ago

Abstract

This action responds to a CAA section 126(b) petitions from five 2016 petitions from Delaware and Maryland requesting that the EPA make a finding pursuant to CAA section 126(b) that emissions from upwind sources significantly contribute to nonattainment and/or interfere with maintenance in violation of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), otherwise known as the good neighbor provision.

Commenters (7)

  • Chesapeake Bay Foundationtrade assoc.
    2 filings · confidence 85%
  • Caesar Rodney Institutetrade assoc.
    1 filing · confidence 85%
  • Environmental Defense Fundtrade assoc.
    1 filing · confidence 97%
  • FirstEnergy Corporationunverified attribution
    1 filing · confidence 70%
  • Indiana Energy Associationtrade assoc.
    1 filing · confidence 85%
  • Mass comment campaign sponsored by Chesapeake Bay Foundation (CBF). Sample attached (email)trade assoc.
    1 filing · confidence 85%
  • Talen Energy Corporationunverified attribution
    1 filing · confidence 70%
View this docket on regulations.gov →

Attribution is name-based and imperfect. regulations.gov data is public record.