EPANonrulemakingEPA-HQ-OGC-2011-0915

Who commented on this docket

Proposed Settlement Agreement in WildEarth Guardians v. EPA, No. 11-9527 (10th Cir.)

1 organizations filed 1 public comment on Proposed Settlement Agreement in WildEarth Guardians v. EPA, No. 11-9527 (10th Cir.), at the Environmental Protection Agency. The comment window closed 5338d ago.

Organizations
1
Comments
1
RIN
Comment window
closed 5338d ago

Abstract

On November 17, 2010, Guardians filed a petition with the Environmental Appeals Board (“EAB”) challenging a Title V Renewal Permit issued by EPA Region 8 on October 18, 2010 to BP America Production Company (“BP”) for its Florida River Compression Station Facility (In re BP America Production Co., Florida River Compression Facility, Appeal No. CAA 10-04). On April 25, 2011, Guardians also filed a petition in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (WildEarth Guardians v. EPA, No. 11-9527) challenging the Administrator’s February 2, 2011 order denying an administrative petition to object to a July 14, 2010 response of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Air Pollution Control Division regarding the issuance of a renewed title V permit for Anadarko Petroleum Corporation’s Frederick Compressor Station. Under the proposed settlement agreements, EPA would agree to undertake a pilot program for the purpose of studying, improving, and streamlining source determinations in the oil and gas industry in new or renewal Title V permits for which Region 8 is the initial Part 71 permitting authority.

Commenters (1)

View this docket on regulations.gov →

Attribution is name-based and imperfect. regulations.gov data is public record.