EPANonrulemakingEPA-HQ-OGC-2012-0644

Who commented on this docket

Proposed Settlement Agreement in Imperial County Air Pollution Control District v. EPA, No. 10-72709 (9th Cir.) and California Department of Parks and Recreation v. EPA, No. 10-72729 (9th Cir.)

1 organizations filed 1 public comment on Proposed Settlement Agreement in Imperial County Air Pollution Control District v. EPA, No. 10-72709 (9th Cir.) and California Department of Parks and Recreation v. EPA, No. 10-72729 (9th Cir.), at the Environmental Protection Agency. The comment window closed 5059d ago.

Organizations
1
Comments
1
RIN
Comment window
closed 5059d ago

Abstract

Plaintiffs filed petitions for review of EPA’s final rule approving in part and disapproving in part the 2005 Imperial County Air Pollution Control District Rules 800 through 806 (known as “Regulation VIII”), a state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of California to EPA in 2006, which intended to limit emissions of PM10 within Imperial County, 75 Fed. Reg. 39,366 (July 8, 2010). The proposed settlement agreement establishes deadlines for EPA to take action.

Commenters (1)

View this docket on regulations.gov →

Attribution is name-based and imperfect. regulations.gov data is public record.