USCRulemakingUSC-RULES-CV-2018-0003
Who commented on this docket
Proposed Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
46 organizations filed 53 public comments on Proposed Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, at the USC. The comment window closed 2720d ago.
Organizations
46
Comments
53
RIN
—
Comment window
closed 2720d ago
Abstract
The Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Civil Rules has proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and requested that the proposals be circulated to the bench, bar, and public for comment. On August 15, 2018, the public comment period opens for the proposed amendments to Civil Rule 30. The public comment period closes on February 15, 2019.
Commenters (46)
- American Association for Justicetrade assoc.4 filings · confidence 85%
- Manchin Injury Law Groupunverified attribution3 filings · confidence 70%
- the National Employment Lawyers Association. [Please Note: The attached comment is among those submitted in response to a prior informal request for comment on a previous draft of the proposed amendments. Not everything in those prior comments pertains to the proposed amendments now published for commenttrade assoc.2 filings · confidence 85%
- US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform. [Please Note: The attached comment is among those submitted in response to a prior informal request for comment on a previous draft of the proposed amendments. Not everything in those prior comments pertains to the proposed amendments now published for commenttrade assoc.2 filings · confidence 85%
- American Association for Justice. [Please Note: The attached comment is among those submitted in response to a prior informal request for comment on a previous draft of the proposed amendments. Not everything in those prior comments pertains to the proposed amendments now published for commenttrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- American Association of Justicetrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- American Tort Reform Association. [Please Note: The attached comment is among those submitted in response to a prior informal request for comment on a previous draft of the proposed amendments. Not everything in those prior comments pertains to the proposed amendments now published for commenttrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Association of Global Automakerstrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Brosseau Bartlett Lieberman LLCunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Colorado Trial Lawyers Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Consumer Justice Law Center LLCunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Eddington Law Firm LLCunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Eden Law Office LLC. [Please Note: The attached comment is among those submitted in response to a prior informal request for comment on a previous draft of the proposed amendments. Not everything in those prior comments pertains to the proposed amendments now published for commentunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Federal Civil Procedure Section Council of the Illinois State Bar Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Federal Magistrate Judges Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Five Points Law Group LLCunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Fogelman & Fogelman LLCunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Ford Motor Companyunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Ford Motor Company. [Please Note: The attached comment is among those submitted in response to a prior informal request for comment on a previous draft of the proposed amendments. Not everything in those prior comments pertains to the proposed amendments now published for commentunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Illinois Trial Lawyers Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- International Association of Defense Counsel.[Please Note: The attached comment is among those submitted in response to a prior informal request for comment on a previous draft of the proposed amendments. Not everything in those prior comments pertains to the proposed amendments now published for commenttrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Kosieradzki Smith Law Firm LLCunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Law Offices of Ben Yeroushalmi A Professional Corpunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- League Creechtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- LLC. [Please Note: The attached comment is among those submitted in response to a prior informal request for comment on a previous draft of the proposed amendments. Not everything in those prior comments pertains to the proposed amendments now published for commentunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Maine Trial Lawyers Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Minnesota State Bar Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- MRHFM LLCunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- National Association of Manufacturers (NAM)trade assoc.1 filing · confidence 97%
- National Consumer Law Center and the National Association of Consumer Advocatestrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- National Employment Lawyers Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- on behalf of American Association for Justicetrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- on behalf of Defense Lawyers Association of Wyomingtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Potter Bolanos LLCunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Product Liability Advisory Counciltrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Project Law Group PLLCunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Ralston Kinney LLCunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Rufo Law Groupunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- the American Tort Reform Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- The Committee to Support the Antitrust Lawstrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- the International Association of Defense Counseltrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- the Product Liability Advisory Council. [Please note: The attached comment is among those submitted in response to a prior informal request for comment on a previous draft of the proposed amendments. Not everything in those prior comments pertains to the proposed amendments now published for commenttrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reformtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Washington Legal Foundationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Wyoming Trial Lawyers Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Zinda Law Groupunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
Attribution is name-based and imperfect. regulations.gov data is public record.