American Chemistry Council filed 3 comments on this docket between Mar 11, 2011 and Apr 16, 2015. 67 other organizations filed here. The comment window closed 4129d ago.
Please find attached the comments of the American Chemistry Council on EPA's Proposed Rule: Improving EPA Regulations, as well as past ACC comments on EPA's retrospective review process. Lorraine Gershman, P.E. Senior Director, Environment and Process Safety
Comments of American Chemistry Council, American Forest & Paper Association, American Iron and Steel Institute, American Petroleum Institute, American Public Power Association, CropLife America, National Association of Home Builders, National Association of Manufacturers, National Cattlemen's Beef Association, National Federation of Independent Businesses, National Oilseed Processors Association, National Petrochemical and Refiners Association, Portland Cement Association, RISE (Responsible Industry for a Sound Environment), and Society of Chemical Manufacturers and Affiliates are attached. Submitted by Joel Visser, Sidley Austin LLC (jvisser@sidley.com)
Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.
This docket contains general public suggestions regarding the design of EPA's plan to periodically review its regulations. This docket should be used when the commenter is not sure what other category to choose, or if the comment spans multiple categories. Also, use this docket to provide other general comments on the factors EPA should consider in conducting its review, the process EPA will use in setting priorities, or the identification of candidate rules for review.
View on regulations.gov →