Dear Acting Assistant Secretary Laihow, The American Health Care Association and National Center for Assisted Living (AHCA/NCAL) is the nation's largest association of long-term and post-acute care providers. Our members provide essential care to millions of individuals in more than 15,000 nursing homes, assisted living communities, and centers for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. AHCA/NCAL aims to improve lives by delivering solutions for quality care. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on OSHA's proposed rule, which would remove some medical evaluation requirements in the Respiratory Protection Rule for certain types of respirators. OSHA also notes that this proposed change would only impact filtering facepiece respirators and loose-fitting powered air-purifying respirators. AHCA/NCAL is supportive of the removal of some medical evaluation requirements in the Respiratory Protection rule for certain types of respirators. During the pandemic, OSHA's requirements to conduct medical evaluations for certain respirators and loose-fitting powered air-purifying respirators aimed to help protect healthcare workers from COVID-19 hazards. No healthcare setting felt the impact of COVID-19 more than long term care. We have come a long way since then, and fortunately, the threat of COVID-19 has greatly diminished. Long term care providers are committed to preventing, monitoring, treating, and reporting COVID-19 and other respiratory virus illnesses among their residents and staff. However, we are no longer in the throes of a pandemic. The Public Health Emergency (PHE) for the COVID-19 pandemic ended in May 2023. Maintaining the medical evaluation requirements more than two years later is no longer appropriate. Moreover, as noted in the proposed rule, despite large increases in respirator usage after the emergent of COVID-19, no evidence has surfaced illustrating the need for medical evaluations for filtering facepiece respirator (FFR) or loose-fitting powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR). Removing unnecessary requirements also helps support patients over paperwork. In the proposed rule, OSHA notes an estimated annual cost savings of $75,039,953 annually from the removal of these provisions. While creating government efficiencies is important, creating opportunities for enhancing care is equally important. By relieving nursing homes and assisted living providers of this burdensome requirement, staff can devote more time to delivering high-quality care. Thank you for considering these comments. Please feel free to reach out to Hawley Hunt at hhunt@ahca.org with any questions or for more information.
Respirators - Medical Clearance
Activity
American Health Care Association (AHCA/NCAL) filed 1 comment on this docket between Nov 3, 2025 and Nov 3, 2025. 18 other organizations filed here. The comment window closed 22d ago.
What American Health Care Association (AHCA/NCAL) filed (1)
Abstract
OSHA is proposing removing the medical evaluation requirements in the Respiratory Protection Rule (1910.134) for employees using filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) and loose-fitting powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs). This change is based on the lack of data indicating adverse health effects from using these respirators. Medical evaluations will remain required for other respirator types - exempting only FFRs and loose-fitting PAPRs. Other provisions of the Respiratory Protection Standard remain unchanged. OSHA invites comments on all aspects of the proposed rule.
View on regulations.gov →Co-filers (18)
See everyone who commented →- American Health Care Association (AHCA/NCAL)THIS ORG1 filing · confidence 97%
- Ad-hoc coalition of trade associationstrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- AFL-CIO1 filing · confidence 97%
- American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA)trade assoc.1 filing · confidence 97%
- American Public Health Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Angus; North American Insulation Manufacturers Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Cheryl; National Roofing Contractors Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Citizens Rulemaking Alliancetrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- CRLA Foundationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Daaiyah; National Education Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Dalia; American Federation of Statetrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Eugene; Institute of Hazardous Materials Managementtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- International Safety Equipment Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Jennylynn Balmer; American Association of Occupational Health Nursestrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Kelly; American Federation of Teacherstrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Kerri; American Public Health Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- National Federation of Independent Businesstrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 97%
- Representative Robert "Bobby"; Committee on Education and Workforce Lettertrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- University of Maryland School of Medicineunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%