← American Petroleum Institute
EPARulemakingEPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0172

Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone

RIN
—
Last modified
Apr 16, 2024
Comment window
closed 5972d ago
American Petroleum Institute filings
10

Activity

American Petroleum Institute filed 10 comments on this docket between Dec 12, 2005 and Jan 26, 2011. 320 other organizations filed here. The comment window closed 5972d ago.

What American Petroleum Institute filed (10)

Jan 26, 2011· Late comment submitted by Howard J. Feldman, Director, Regulatory & Scientific Affairs, American Petroleum Institute (API)· EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0172-13001

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

View on regulations.gov →
Mar 23, 2010· Comment submitted by Ted Steichen, Policy Advisor, Regulatory Scientific Affairs, American Petroleum Institute (API)· EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0172-12162

EPA's unprecedented proposal to reconsider and lower the O3 NAAQS is not consistent with the Act and can be expected, if it is finalized, to have a significant adverse impact on the economy and on jobs. The science to support lower primary and secondary NAAQS is lacking. Use of reconsideration to reach a politically-driven judgment to lower the NAAQS would set an unfortunate precedent for future EPA Administrators to conduct an endless and arbitrary series of reconsiderations. The result would be a lack of certainty upon which business decisions could be based, harming the Nation's economy and potentially bringing to a standstill air quality improvement. EPA should withdraw the Reconsideration Proposal

View on regulations.gov →
Mar 23, 2010· Comment submitted by Howard J. Feldman, Director, Regulatory and Scientific Affairs, American Petroleum Institute (API)· EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0172-12158

Remaining Elements of Comment Package. EPA's unprecedented proposal to reconsider and lower the O3 NAAQS is not consistent with the Act and can be expected, if it is finalized, to have a significant adverse impact on the economy and on jobs. The science to support lower primary and secondary NAAQS is lacking. Use of reconsideration to reach a politically-driven judgment to lower the NAAQS would set an unfortunate precedent for future EPA Administrators to conduct an endless and arbitrary series of reconsiderations. The result would be a lack of certainty upon which business decisions could be based, harming the Nation's economy and potentially bringing to a standstill air quality improvement. EPA should withdraw the Reconsideration Proposal

View on regulations.gov →
Mar 19, 2010· Comment submitted by Julie Goodman, PhD, DABT, Gradient, on behalf of American Petroleum Institute (API)· EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0172-11919

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

View on regulations.gov →
Mar 9, 2010· Comment submitted by Ted Steichen, Policy Advisor, Regulatory and Scientific Affairs, American Petroleum Institute (API)· EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0172-10517

Request for Comment Extension

View on regulations.gov →
Feb 4, 2008· Comment submitted by Howard J. Feldman, Director, Regulatory and Scientific Affairs, American Petroleum Institute (API)· EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0172-7051

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

View on regulations.gov →
Oct 10, 2007· Comment submitted by Howard J. Feldman, Director, Regulatory and Scientific Affairs, American Petroleum Institute (API)· EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0172-4141

The American Petroleum Institute (API) is the primary trade association of America?s oil and natural gas industry which represents more than 400 members involved in all aspects of the industry. API has participated as a stakeholder in this, and prior, reviews of the ozone NAAQS and appreciates the opportunity to comment on this proposed rule. The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is soliciting comment on either revising or retaining the current primary and secondary ozone standards. API supports retaining the current standards, which ensures significant further emission reductions and corresponding air quality improvements.

View on regulations.gov →
Sep 20, 2006· Comment submitted by Howard Feldman, American Petroleum Institute· EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0172-0057

Comments on Ozone Staff Paper - 2nd Draft

View on regulations.gov →
Aug 31, 2006· Comment submitted by Will M. Ollison, Senior Scientist, Regulatory and Scientific Affairs, American Petroleum Institute (API)· EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0172-0037

Please find a copy of information provided to Dr. Karen Martin, U.S. E.P.A. by Will Ollison, Senior Scientist, American Petroleum Institute via e-mail, August 28, 2006, 13:45. The e-mail included the note: "Attached for your information are the documents we discussed at the CASAC meeting last Friday."

View on regulations.gov →
Dec 12, 2005· Comment submitted by Will Ollison, American Petroleum Institute (API)· EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0172-0009

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

View on regulations.gov →

Abstract

Contact: Susan Lyon Stone USEPA/OAR/OAQPS, (919) 541-1146

View on regulations.gov →

Co-filers (320)

See everyone who commented →
Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone (EPA) — American Petroleum Institute | OpenPolis