American Petroleum Institute
EPANonrulemakingEPA-HQ-ORD-2007-0517

Integrated Science Assessment (ISA) for Particulate Matter

RIN
Last modified
Apr 16, 2024
Comment window
closed 6132d ago
American Petroleum Institute filings
2

Activity

American Petroleum Institute filed 2 comments on this docket between Mar 16, 2009 and Oct 16, 2009. 14 other organizations filed here. The comment window closed 6132d ago.

What American Petroleum Institute filed (2)

Oct 16, 2009· Comment submitted by Ted Steichen, Policy Advisor, Regulatory and Scientific Affairs, American Petroleum Institute (API)· EPA-HQ-ORD-2007-0517-0079

See the attachment for comments on the 2nd External Draft of the PM ISA by the American Petroleum Institute.

Mar 16, 2009· Comment submitted by Ted Steichen, Advisor, Regulatory and Scientific Affairs, American Petroleum Institute (API)· EPA-HQ-ORD-2007-0517-0023

The American Petroleum Institute (API) represents nearly 400 member companies involved in all aspects of the oil and natural gas industry. API is pleased to submit the following comments on the Integrated Science Assessment (ISA) for Particulate Matter (PM) First External Review Draft. API finds this First Draft does not provide sufficient scientific evidence to suggest PM2.5 causes health effects at levels below the current NAAQS. API recommends that EPA develops the Second Draft to more accurately reflect the available science issues raised in the comments below and the Attachments.

Abstract

Particulate matter is one of six principal pollutants for which EPA has established NAAQS. Periodically, EPA reviews the scientific basis for these standards by preparing an Integrated Science Assessment (ISA). The ISA and supplementary annexes are the scientific bases for the additional technical and policy assessments that form the basis for EPA decisions on the adequacy of a current NAAQS and the appropriateness of new or revised standards.

View on regulations.gov →