Apr 21, 2004· Comment referring to "these supplemental comments specifically address petroleum bulk storage terminal (PBST) facilities" submitted by Roger E. Claff, American Petroleum Institute.· EPA-HQ-OW-2003-0074-0749
Roger Claff <Claff@api.org>
04/21/2004 11:23 AM
To: Group Ow-Docket@EPA
cc:
Subject: Supplemental Comments on EPA Notice of Preliminary Effluent Guidelines Plan,
OW-2003-0074
Dear Docket Clerk,
Attached are supplemental comments from the American Petroleum Institute,
on EPA's Preliminary Effluent Guidelines Plan, 68 FR 75515, December 31,
2003, Docket No. OW-2003-0074. Please reply and acknowledge receipt of
the attached and that you are able to read the file. Thanks!
Roger Claff, P.E.
Senior Environmental Scientist
American Petroleum Institute
1220 L Street Northwest
Washington, DC 20005
(202) 682-8399
(202) 682-8270 (FAX)
claff@api.org
Apr 21, 2004· Comment referring to "development of effluent limitations guidelines and standards for the petroleum bulk storage terminal (PBST) category would waste Agency and industry resources" submitted by Roger Claff, American Petroleum Institute (AP· EPA-HQ-OW-2003-0074-0750
Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.
Mar 18, 2004· Comment referring to "there would be little or no environmental benefit to be gained by reopening this regulation for review" submitted by Roger Claff, American Petroleum Institute (API)· EPA-HQ-OW-2003-0074-0728
Roger Claff <Claff@api.org>
03/18/2004 03:30 PM
To: Group Ow-Docket@EPA
cc:
Subject:American Petroleum Institute - Supplementary Comments on Preliminary Effluent Guidelines
Plan, OW-2003-0074
Dear Docket Clerk:
The American Petroleum Institute (API) is pleased to provide the attached
supplemental comments on EPA's preliminary effluent guidelines plan, 68 FR
75515, December 31, 2003, Docket Number OW-2003-0074. The attached
comments are supplementary to API's previously submitted comments, dated
February 23, 2004.
Please acknowledge your receipt of these comments, and that you are able
to open the attached file. Thank you for your assistance.
Roger Claff, P.E.
Senior Environmental Scientist
American Petroleum Institute
1220 L Street Northwest
Washington, DC 20005
(202) 682-8399
(202) 682-8270 (FAX)
claff@api.org
Mar 18, 2004· Comment referring to "there would be little or no environmental benefit to be gained by reopening this regulation for review" submitted by Roger Claff, American Petroleum Institute (API)· EPA-HQ-OW-2003-0074-0729
Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.
Feb 24, 2004· Comment focusing on "Reopening the effluent guidelines for revision would be costly and time-consuming process for both the petroleum industry and EPA," submitted by Roger E. Claff, Senior Environmental Scientist, American Petroleum Institute (API)· EPA-HQ-OW-2003-0074-0665
Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.
Feb 24, 2004· Comment focusing on "Reopening the effluent guidelines for revision would be costly and time-consuming process for both the petroleum industry and EPA," submitted by Roger E. Claff, Senior Environmental Scientist, American Petroleum Institute (API)· EPA-HQ-OW-2003-0074-0666
Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.