American Public Power Association
EPANonrulemakingEPA-HQ-OGC-2011-1030

Proposed Settlement Agreement in EnerNOC, et al v. EPA, No. 10-1090 (D.C. Cir.) and EnerNOC, et al v. EPA, No. 10-1336 (D.C. Cir.).

RIN
Last modified
Mar 25, 2022
Comment window
closed 5289d ago
American Public Power Association filings
1

Activity

American Public Power Association filed 1 comment on this docket between Feb 15, 2012 and Feb 15, 2012. 2 other organizations filed here. The comment window closed 5289d ago.

What American Public Power Association filed (1)

Feb 15, 2012· Comment submitted by Alex Hofmann, Senior Energy & Environmental Services Engineer and Theresa Pugh, Director, Environmental Services, American Public Power Association (APPA)· EPA-HQ-OGC-2011-1030-0049

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

Abstract

Petitioners filed for review of two EPA rulemakings that revised the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines (the RICE NESHAP). Under the terms of the proposed settlement agreement, by April 20, 2012, the Agency will sign a notice of proposed rulemaking that includes a proposal to revise the RICE NESHAP and the stationary internal combustion engine new source performance standards (ICE NSPS) to allow owners and operators of emergency stationary internal combustion engines to operate emergency stationary internal combustion engines in emergency conditions, as defined in those regulations, as part of an emergency demand response program for 60 hours per year or the minimum hours required by Independent System Operator tariff, whichever is less. The notice of proposed rulemaking may also allow for more hours of operation. In addition, under the terms of the proposed settlement agreement, by December 14, 2012, the Administrator of EPA will sign a final action on this proposal, which may include signature of a final rule by the Administrator. If EPA promulgates in final form an amendment to the RICE NESHAP and ICE NSPS that includes changes that are substantially the same substance as that set forth in the settlement agreement, then Petitioners shall promptly file a stipulation of dismissal of Nos. 10-1090 and 10-1336.

View on regulations.gov →