Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.
National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule; National Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Regulations: Approval of Analytical Methods for Chemical Contaminants
Activity
American Water Works Association filed 11 comments on this docket between Jan 16, 2004 and Nov 14, 2005. 56 other organizations filed here. The comment window closed 7585d ago.
What American Water Works Association filed (11)
Attached comments are submitted on behalf of the American Water Works Association. If there any difficulties in this transmission please contact Steve Via at (202) 628-8303.
Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.
Steve Via <svia@awwa.org> 04/15/2004 03:30 PM To: DBP OGWDW@EPA cc: Thomas Grubbs/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Group Ow-Docket@EPA, Katie Porter/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Dan Schmelling/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Subject: Comments on Stage 2 DBPR and LT2ESWTR Implementation Guidance (OW-2002- 0043, OW-2002-0039) Attached are American Water Works Association's (AWWA) informal comments on the State Implementation Guidances for Stage 2 DBPR and LT2ESWTR. Thank you for providing the opportunity to review and offer comments regarding both these documents. Please contact me at 202-628-8303 if there are any difficulties with or questions regarding this transmission. Best regards, Steve Via Steve Via American Water Works Association 1401 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 640 Washington, D.C. 20005 v. (202) 628-8303 f. (202) 628-2846 e. svia@awwa.org ________________________________________________________________________ American Water Works Association The Authoritative Resource for Safe Drinking Water (SM) One World, One Water, One event not to be missed. Coming June 13-17, 2004 in Orlando, FL, ACE has everything you are looking for in one place! Register online www.awwa.org This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. ________________________________________________________________________
Appendix 5. Evaluation of Stage 2 Significant Excursion Criteria Using Historical Utility Data and ICR Data
Appendix 6d. Memorandum to Steve Via, AWWA from Issam Najm, Water Quality & Treatment Solutions, Inc. (WQTS), re: findings regarding the potential synergy between ozone and chloramine for the inactivation of Cryptosporidium
Appendix 3 a, b, and c. Review of the Epidemiology Health Effects Data Supporting the Stage 2 DPBR. This document is copyrighted and may not be reproduced without consent of the copyright holder.
Attached are joint comments filed by the American Water Works Association, Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies, National Association of Water Companies, and The National League of Cities. If you encounter any difficulties with the attached file, please contact Steve Via at 202-628-8303.
Appendix 6e. Chloramine Synergy Databse WQTS (Excel File)
Appendix 4. Significant Excursion EPA min3x3 Analysis
Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.
Abstract
Contact: Tom Grubbs, USEPA/OW/OGWDW, (202) 564-5262, HQ
View on regulations.gov →Co-filers (56)
See everyone who commented →- American Water Works AssociationTHIS ORG11 filings · confidence 97%
- Chlorine Chemistry Counciltrade assoc.7 filings · confidence 85%
- Association of Metropolitan Water Agenciestrade assoc.5 filings · confidence 97%
- Association of State Drinking Water Administratorstrade assoc.4 filings · confidence 85%
- Association of California Water Agenciestrade assoc.3 filings · confidence 85%
- Maryland Department of the Environmentunverified attribution3 filings · confidence 70%
- and combined systems" submitted by Bruce A. Haleunverified attribution2 filings · confidence 70%
- Central Utah Water Conservancy Districtunverified attribution2 filings · confidence 70%
- Department of Environment and Natural Resourcesunverified attribution2 filings · confidence 70%
- Fairfax County Water Authorityunverified attribution2 filings · confidence 70%
- Los Angeles Department of Water and Powerunverified attribution2 filings · confidence 70%
- National Rural Water Associationtrade assoc.2 filings · confidence 85%
- Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)trade assoc.2 filings · confidence 97%
- referring to "This huge volume of the new regulations with their accompanying guidance manuals has placed a significant burden on water systems and state agencies" submitted by Florence Reynoldsunverified attribution2 filings · confidence 70%
- San Francisco Public Utilities Commissionunverified attribution2 filings · confidence 70%
- Water Services Departmentunverified attribution2 filings · confidence 70%
- Wisconsin Department of Natural Resourcesunverified attribution2 filings · confidence 70%
- Alliance for Healthy Homes et altrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Companyunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- American Chemistry Counciltrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 97%
- Anonymous Comment referring to "Systems that are on reduced monitoring frequencies for Total Trihalomethanes and Haloacetic Acids (5) as determined previously by their State Primacy Agency"unverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Bureau of Water Supplyunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Champlain Water Districtunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- City of Akron Public Utilities Bureauunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Clemson Universityunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Colorado Springs Utilities (PWSID # CO0121150) and Fountain Valley Authority (PWSID # CO0121300)unverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Combined Distribution Systemsunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Consumer Federation of Americatrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Department of Envirnmental Qualityunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Department of Environmental Qualityunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Department of Water Worksunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- focusing on American Water Works Association (AWWA) request to correct two items located in Appendix 1 " Review of the Toxicological Health Effects Data Supporting the Stage 2 DBPR" submitted by Thomas W. Curtistrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Georgia Rural Water Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- HNTB Corporationunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Inc. Bio-Filtration Operations Manualunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Inc. Coagulation and Filtration. Figure 3unverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Inc. New Surface Water Purification Technologies Improve Water Quality While Reducing Production Costsunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Inc. Proposed NSF/ANSI Bio-Filtration Standardunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Kentucky Rural Water Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Miami Dade Water and Sewer Departmentunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- North Dakota Department of Healthunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Philadelphia Water Departmentunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Public Utilities Bureau Managerunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- referring to "applying a population based approach to monitoring for all systems for IDSE and Stage2 compliance" submitted by United Water New Jerseyunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- referring to "City of Portland supporting proposal to allow States to develop a program under which the State can modify monitoring requirements for consecutive systems" submitted by Mark Knudsonunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- referring to "supports the USEPA's (USEPAs) efforts to increase public health protection by limiting exposures to disinfection byproducts in drinking water" submitted by New York State Department of Healthunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- referring to Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule's "unnecessary costs to our water systems and customer"unverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- referring to the Stage 2 Disinfection By-Products rule on IDSE for small systemsunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- referring toStage 2 disinfection By-Products rule on IDSE for small systemsunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- refers to the "requirement for large and medium systems to collect data and prepare their initial distribution system evaluation (IDSE) report within two years of the final rule publication"unverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- regarding "flexibility in sampling plan requirements by allowing both population-based and plant-based sampling for systems with plants" submitted by Jacqueline Strongunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Texas Commission on Environmental Qualityunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- University of North Carolinaunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- US Department of Defenseunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Washington Suburban Sanitary Commissionunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Weber Basin Water Conservancy Districtunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Western Coalition of Arid Statestrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%