California Specialty Crops Council
EPANonrulemakingEPA-HQ-OGC-2018-0745

Ellis v. Keigwin, No. 3:13-cv-01266 (ND CA)

RIN
Last modified
Mar 25, 2022
Comment window
closed 2755d ago
California Specialty Crops Council filings
1

Activity

California Specialty Crops Council filed 1 comment on this docket between Jan 30, 2019 and Jan 30, 2019. 1 other organizations filed here. The comment window closed 2755d ago.

What California Specialty Crops Council filed (1)

Jan 30, 2019· Comment submitted by Gary W. Van Sickle, Executive Director, California Specialty Crops Council (CSCC)· EPA-HQ-OGC-2018-0745-0007

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

Abstract

On May 8, 2017, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California found that EPA had failed to comply with the consultation requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) with respect to 59 products containing the insecticide active ingredients clothianidin and thiamethoxam. The proposed stipulation and stipulated notice of dismissal would settle the remedy proceeding in that matter. The proposed stipulation provides, among other things, that EPA would agree to complete ESA effects determinations by June 30, 2022, for its FIFRA registration review of clothianidin and thiamethoxam and, as appropriate, request initiation of ESA consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service.

View on regulations.gov →