The Center for Biological Diversity is attaching comments recently submitted to this docket on January 16, 2018 We are also attaching a letter sent to pesticide registrants by the EPA dated April 2, 2015. The purpose of this letter was to inform registrants that the EPA was "unlikely to be in a position to determine that such [new uses of neonicotinoids] would avoid "unreasonable adverse effects on the environment" as required under FIFRA to support further regulatory expansion of these pesticides in outdoor settings." And that "... until EPA receives and assesses the outstanding pollinator health data, EPA is unlikely to be in a position to grant any submitted registration action that involves a request with one of these pesticides for a new outdoor use or use expansion." We would like to remind the EPA that it has still not fully assessed outstanding pollinator health data for thiamethoxam. The agency has only completed a preliminary bee risk assessment. That document was posted for public review and comment and the agency is in receipt of many comments pointing out the deficiencies in this assessment. So until the agency has fixed the many deficiencies in its preliminary bee health risk assessment, the agency cannot consider the regulatory expansion for new uses of thiamethoxam. With a ban on neonicotinoids in place in European Union, new restrictions just proposed for thiamethoxam in Canada, and the state of California no longer considering new uses of neonicotinoids, the U.S. EPA stands out as incredibly out of touch with scientific consensus on the harms of neonicotinoids. By even considering such an ill-advised proposal, the agency is isolating itself from its peers within the U.S. and around the world. We strongly urge the EPA to deny this application.
EPARulemakingEPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0234
Petition to Amend and add New Tolerances on Specific Crops for Thiamethoxam
RIN
—
Last modified
May 18, 2018
Comment window
closed 3036d ago
Center for Biological Diversity filings
2
Activity
Center for Biological Diversity filed 2 comments on this docket between Feb 2, 2018 and May 8, 2018. 2 other organizations filed here. The comment window closed 3036d ago.
What Center for Biological Diversity filed (2)
May 8, 2018· Comment submitted by Nathan Donley, PhD, Senior Scientist and Stephanie M. Parent, Senior Attorney, Center for Biological Diversity· EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0234-0832
Feb 2, 2018· Comment submitted by Nathan Donley, PhD, Senior Scientist, and Stephanie M. Parent, Senior Attorney, Environmental Health Program, Center for Biological Diversity (Center) and Center for Food Safety (CFS)· EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0234-0450
Please see attached files submitted by the Center for Biological Diversity and the Center for Food Safety
Abstract
The amended tolerances are due to adding foliar treatment to the labels where a seed treatment tolerance has already been established on the following crops; wheat, barley, corn, sorghum, alfalfa, rice and potato. A new tolerance is being established on sugarcane and rice and this is due to foliar application.
View on regulations.gov →Co-filers (2)
See everyone who commented →- Center for Biological DiversityTHIS ORG2 filings · confidence 97%
- Boston Universityunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Empire State Honey Producers Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%