EPANonrulemakingEPA-HQ-OW-2003-0074

Effluent Guidelines Program Plan for 2004/2005.

RIN

—

Last modified

May 22, 2023

Comment window

closed 8033d ago

Chesapeake Bay Foundation filings

Activity

Chesapeake Bay Foundation filed 1 comment on this docket between Mar 16, 2004 and Mar 16, 2004. 35 other organizations filed here. The comment window closed 8033d ago.

What Chesapeake Bay Foundation filed (1)

Mar 16, 2004· Comment referring to "the development of Effluent Limitation Guidelines that employ Best Conventional Pollutant Control Technology (BCT)" submitted by William J. Gerlach, Attorney, Chesapeake Bay Foundation· EPA-HQ-OW-2003-0074-0685

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

View on regulations.gov →

Abstract

Point of Contact: Carey A. Johnston, USEPA/OST, 202-566-1014, 4303T, HQ.

View on regulations.gov →

Co-filers (35)

See everyone who commented →

Chesapeake Bay FoundationTHIS ORG
1 filing · confidence 85%
American Petroleum Institutetrade assoc.
6 filings · confidence 97%
National Petrochemical & Refiners Associationtrade assoc.
3 filings · confidence 85%
Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)trade assoc.
3 filings · confidence 97%
Petroleum Marketers Association of Americatrade assoc.
3 filings · confidence 85%
American Chemistry Counciltrade assoc.
2 filings · confidence 97%
American Forest & Paper Associationtrade assoc.
2 filings · confidence 97%
Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agenciestrade assoc.
2 filings · confidence 85%
The Dow Chemical Companyunverified attribution
2 filings · confidence 70%
Vinyl Institutetrade assoc.
2 filings · confidence 85%
Aleyska Pipeline Service Companyunverified attribution
1 filing · confidence 70%
Amerada Hess Corporationunverified attribution
1 filing · confidence 70%
Association of American Railroadstrade assoc.
1 filing · confidence 97%
Chlorine Chemistry Counciltrade assoc.
1 filing · confidence 85%
Cook Inlet Regional Citizens Advisory Counciltrade assoc.
1 filing · confidence 85%
Edgewater Support Services Inc.unverified attribution
1 filing · confidence 70%
Engineer Industrial Waste & Pollution Prevention Section Metropolitan Council Environmental Servicestrade assoc.
1 filing · confidence 85%
General Electric Companyunverified attribution
1 filing · confidence 70%
Independent Liquid Terminals Associationtrade assoc.
1 filing · confidence 85%
Intercontinental Chemical Corporationunverified attribution
1 filing · confidence 70%
League of Women Voterstrade assoc.
1 filing · confidence 97%
Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Cincinnatiunverified attribution
1 filing · confidence 70%
National Paint and Coatings Associationtrade assoc.
1 filing · confidence 85%
Petroleum Marketers Association Americatrade assoc.
1 filing · confidence 85%
Port Graham Village Counciltrade assoc.
1 filing · confidence 85%
Rayonier Inc.unverified attribution
1 filing · confidence 70%
referring to "ConocoPhillips recommends that USEPA utilize their four factor analysis to assess and screen industries for guidelines review utilizing monitoring data available from the States" submitted by Mickey Carterunverified attribution
1 filing · confidence 70%
referring to "EPA cannot include these industries under the OCPSF category since the processesunverified attribution
1 filing · confidence 70%
referring to "EPA should not establish Effluent Guidelines for petroleum bulk stations and terminals" submitted by New England Fuel Institutetrade assoc.
1 filing · confidence 85%
referring to "The Independent Fuel Terminal Operators Association strongly recommends that USEPA refrain from initiating a rulemaking for this subcategory of facilities" [Petroleum bulk stations and terminals]trade assoc.
1 filing · confidence 85%
referring to "UTSA supports USEPA's (USEPA) current methodology that considers industries that are 100% populated with indirect discharges (facilities that discharge directly to the sanitary sewer) as 'trivial'" submitted by David D. Dunlap,unverified attribution
1 filing · confidence 70%
referring to several general flaws in the USEPA techniques and data used to evaluate the Porcelain Enamel industry submitted by the Porcelain Enamel Institutetrade assoc.
1 filing · confidence 85%
Sand & Gravel Associationtrade assoc.
1 filing · confidence 85%
Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturers Associationtrade assoc.
1 filing · confidence 85%
Treated Wood Counciltrade assoc.
1 filing · confidence 85%
Virginia Association of Municipal Wastewatertrade assoc.
1 filing · confidence 85%