As a supporter of Defenders of Wildlife and someone who cares about protecting human health and our environment, I strongly urge the EPA to take swift action to cancel all remaining uses of endosulfan and revoke all food residue tolerances for this toxic chemical. As you know, endosulfan is a neurotoxic organochlorine pesticide -- similar to DDT and other insecticides that have been banned in the U.S. for decades. Like these other pesticides, endosulfan has a wide range of environmental and health risks to birds and other wildlife. Threatened northern leopard frogs are especially vulnerable its effects. In one recent scientific study, even a low dose of endosulfan was enough to kill 84% of leopard frog tadpoles that came in contact with it. According to the study's lead author, Rick Relyea, "Endosulfan appears to be about 1,000-times more lethal to amphibians than other pesticides that we have examined." But the environmental threat of endosulfan is even more far-reaching. Endosulfan is highly toxic to birds, very highly toxic to aquatic fauna both vertebrate (fish, amphibians) and invertebrates (mollusks, insects, gastropods), and highly toxic to mammals. Endosulfan has even been detected in arctic ice and snow samples, showing just how persistent this deadly poison is. Even worse, as the Environmental Protection Agency's 2007 study shows, endosulfan poses unacceptable human health risks to farm workers and those who apply this deadly poison. Even at low levels, it has been linked to hormone disruption, male reproductive harm, autism, and birth defects. At higher levels, endosulfan can cause headaches, vomiting, convulsions, and in extreme cases, unconsciousness and even death. For all of these reasons, I urge you to move as quickly as possibly to get endosulfan off the market. The risks to our health and to our wildlife are simply too great to allow its continued use. Thank you for considering my comments.
EPANonrulemakingEPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0615
Petitions Requesting Revocation of Tolerances and Cancellation of Uses for Endosulfan
RIN
—
Last modified
Jun 30, 2015
Comment window
closed 6238d ago
Defenders of Wildlife filings
2
Activity
Defenders of Wildlife filed 2 comments on this docket between Jul 14, 2009 and Jul 29, 2009. 9 other organizations filed here. The comment window closed 6238d ago.
What Defenders of Wildlife filed (2)
Jul 29, 2009· Mass Comment Campaign entitled " Supporter of Defenders of Wildlife and Someone Who Cares About Protecting Human Health and Our Environment" sponored by the Defenders of Wildlife· EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0615-0050
Jul 14, 2009· Comment submitted by Caroline Kennedy, Defenders of Wildlife· EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0615-0047
Please find attached two files containing the comments of more than 37,000 activists who responded to the alert regarding the cancellation of endosulfan (EPA– HQ–OPP–2008–0615). A disk containing the same comments has been sent by courier. Caroline Kennedy Senior Director for Field Conservation Defenders of Wildlife 1130 17th Street, NW Washington, DC 20036-4604 ckennedy@defenders.org 202-682-9400
Abstract
For further information contact: Melanie Biscoe (703) 305-7106 Mail code 7508P
View on regulations.gov →Co-filers (9)
See everyone who commented →- Defenders of WildlifeTHIS ORG2 filings · confidence 97%
- Arizona Cotton Growers Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Association of Villge Council Presidentstrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Atmautluak Traditional Counciltrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- National Cotton Counciltrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 97%
- National Potato Counciltrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 97%
- Northwest Horticultural Counciltrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 97%
- Sr. Manokotak Village Counciltrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- University of Arizonaunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- US Apple Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%