Environmental Defense Fund
EPARulemakingEPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259

Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science

RIN
Last modified
Apr 14, 2022
Comment window
closed 2262d ago
Environmental Defense Fund filings
37

Activity

Environmental Defense Fund filed 37 comments on this docket between May 8, 2018 and Jan 5, 2021. 230 other organizations filed here. The comment window closed 2262d ago.

What Environmental Defense Fund filed (25+)

Jan 5, 2021· Comments submitted by Ben Levitan, Senior Attorney, U.S. Clean Air, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF)· EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-22421

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

May 29, 2020· Comment submitted by Dena Adler et al., Environmental Defense Fund (EDF)· EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-12727

Please find attached the comments of Environmental Defense Fund on EPA's Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: "Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science," 85 Fed. Reg. 15,396 (Mar. 18, 2020).

May 29, 2020· Comment submitted by Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) (Attachments 60 to 77)· EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-12731

Environmental Defense Fund submits the attached documents to Docket No. EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259 in support of our public comments on EPA's Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: "Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science," 85 Fed. Reg. 15,396 (Mar. 18, 2020). The attached documents were also submitted physically to EPA on May 13, 2020, via postal mail. Part 4 of 4

May 29, 2020· Comment submitted by Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) (Attachments 21 to 40)· EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-12729

Environmental Defense Fund submits the attached documents to Docket No. EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259 in support of our public comments on EPA's Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: "Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science," 85 Fed. Reg. 15,396 (Mar. 18, 2020). The attached documents were also submitted physically to EPA on May 13, 2020, via postal mail. Part 2 of 4

May 29, 2020· Comment submitted by Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) (Attachments 41 to 59)· EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-12730

Environmental Defense Fund submits the attached documents to Docket No. EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259 in support of our public comments on EPA's Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: "Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science," 85 Fed. Reg. 15,396 (Mar. 18, 2020). The attached documents were also submitted physically to EPA on May 13, 2020, via postal mail. Part 3 of 4

May 29, 2020· Comment submitted by Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) (Attachments 1 to 20)· EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-12728

Environmental Defense Fund submits the attached documents to Docket No. EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259 in support of our public comments on EPA's Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: "Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science," 85 Fed. Reg. 15,396 (Mar. 18, 2020). The attached documents were also submitted physically to EPA on May 13, 2020, via postal mail. Part 1 of 4

May 22, 2020· Mass Comment Campaign Sponsored by Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) (web)· EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-11832

To Whom It May Concern: Attached, please find the signatures of 79,572 Environmental Defense Fund supporters from across the country who have submitted electronic comments regarding the EPA Proposed Rule "Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science." The text of the comments they submitted reads: "Launching an attack on scientific integrity in the midst of a crisis exacerbated by the administration's instinct to devalue science is a mistake. Giving the public an additional month to weigh in on a major proposal that will make sweeping changes to the way EPA considers science is not nearly enough time. "It is critical that you suspend the comment period on EPA's supplemental proposal to the Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science proposed rulemaking until the end of the COVID-19 crisis, and then provide at least 90 days for public comment from that point. "We are dealing with an unprecedented national emergency. To suggest that the public, and especially top public health experts, should divert their attention in order to meet the agency's ill-timed and arbitrary comment deadline is irrational and dangerous. We know that this crisis will not be resolved by May 18th. We need more time. "This attack on science must be halted immediately." Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns about this submission. Thank you for your consideration, Heather Shelby Manager, Grassroots Organizing & Activism Environmental Defense Fund hshelby@edf.org

May 20, 2020· Comment submitted by Ben Levitan, Senior Attorney, US Clean Air Team, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF)· EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-11345

To Whom It May Concern: The attached comments were provided orally at a virtual public hearing hosted by the Union of Concerned Scientists on Tuesday, April 14, 2020, in regard to EPA's Proposed Rule: Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science. They were provided by Ben Levitan. They were transcribed by Olender Reporting, Inc. To view the comments as delivered, and to access the full transcripts of all three virtual public hearings, please visit https://www.ucsusa.org/virtual-public-hearing-epa-supplemental-rule.

May 20, 2020· Comment submitted by Jennifer McPartland, Senior Scientist, Environmental Defense Fund· EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-11329

To Whom It May Concern: The attached comments were provided orally at a virtual public hearing hosted by the Union of Concerned Scientists on Tuesday, April 14, 2020, in regard to EPA's Proposed Rule: Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science. They were provided by Jennifer McPartland. They were transcribed by Olender Reporting, Inc. To view the comments as delivered, and to access the full transcripts of all three virtual public hearings, please visit https://www.ucsusa.org/virtual-public-hearing-epa-supplemental-rule.

Apr 30, 2020· Comment submitted by Lance Bowman et al., Environmental Defense Fund (EDF)· EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-10970

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

Mar 20, 2020· Comment submitted by Dena Adler et al., Environmental Defense Fund (EDF)· EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-9336

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

Jan 29, 2020· Comment submitted by Lance Bowman et al., Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) (Supplemental)· EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-9307

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

Jul 18, 2019· Comment submitted by Tomás Carbonell and Martha Roberts, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF)· EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-9302

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

Sep 10, 2018· Comment submitted by Tomás Carbonell, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) et al. (Part 8 of 15 )· EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-9234

Please find attached materials supporting the Comment of the Environmental Defense Fund on Proposed Rule: Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science, 83 Fed. Reg. 18768 (Apr. 30, 2018).

Sep 10, 2018· Comment submitted by Tomás Carbonell, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) et al. (Part 15 of 15)· EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-9241

Please find attached materials supporting the Comment of the Environmental Defense Fund on Proposed Rule: Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science, 83 Fed. Reg. 18768 (Apr. 30, 2018).

Sep 10, 2018· Comment submitted by Tomás Carbonell, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) et al. (Part 6 of 15)· EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-9232

Please find attached materials supporting the Comment of the Environmental Defense Fund on Proposed Rule: Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science, 83 Fed. Reg. 18768 (Apr. 30, 2018).

Sep 10, 2018· Comment submitted by Tomás Carbonell, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) et al. (Part 3 of 15)· EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-9229

Please find attached materials supporting the Comment of the Environmental Defense Fund on Proposed Rule: Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science, 83 Fed. Reg. 18768 (Apr. 30, 2018).

Sep 10, 2018· Comment submitted by Tomás Carbonell, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) et al. (Part 4 of 15)· EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-9230

Please find attached materials supporting the Comment of the Environmental Defense Fund on Proposed Rule: Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science, 83 Fed. Reg. 18768 (Apr. 30, 2018).

Sep 10, 2018· Comment submitted by Tomás Carbonell, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) et al. (Part 1 of 15)· EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-9227

Please find attached Comment of the Environmental Defense Fund on Proposed Rule: Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science, 83 Fed. Reg. 18768 (Apr. 30, 2018).

Sep 10, 2018· Comment submitted by Tomás Carbonell, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) et al. (Part 12 of 15)· EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-9238

Please find attached materials supporting the Comment of the Environmental Defense Fund on Proposed Rule: Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science, 83 Fed. Reg. 18768 (Apr. 30, 2018).

Sep 10, 2018· Comment submitted by Tomás Carbonell, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) et al. (Part 13 of 15)· EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-9239

Please find attached materials supporting the Comment of the Environmental Defense Fund on Proposed Rule: Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science, 83 Fed. Reg. 18768 (Apr. 30, 2018).

Sep 10, 2018· Comment submitted by Tomás Carbonell, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) et al. (Part 9 of 15)· EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-9235

Please find attached materials supporting the Comment of the Environmental Defense Fund on Proposed Rule: Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science, 83 Fed. Reg. 18768 (Apr. 30, 2018).

Sep 10, 2018· Comment submitted by Tomás Carbonell, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) et al. (Part 11 of 15)· EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-9237

Please find attached materials supporting the Comment of the Environmental Defense Fund on Proposed Rule: Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science, 83 Fed. Reg. 18768 (Apr. 30, 2018).

Sep 10, 2018· Comment submitted by Tomás Carbonell, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) et al. (Part 10 of 15)· EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-9236

Please find attached materials supporting the Comment of the Environmental Defense Fund on Proposed Rule: Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science, 83 Fed. Reg. 18768 (Apr. 30, 2018).

Sep 10, 2018· Comment submitted by Tomás Carbonell, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) et al. (Part 2 of 15)· EPA-HQ-OA-2018-0259-9228

Please find attached materials supporting the Comment of the Environmental Defense Fund on Proposed Rule: Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science, 83 Fed. Reg. 18768 (Apr. 30, 2018).

Abstract

This docket will collect comments from a notice proposing a regulation intended to strengthen the transparency of EPA regulatory science.

View on regulations.gov →