Environmental Defense Fund
EPANonrulemakingEPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0216

Control Techniques Guideline for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry

RIN
Last modified
Apr 20, 2022
Comment window
closed 2831d ago
Environmental Defense Fund filings
5

Activity

Environmental Defense Fund filed 5 comments on this docket between Mar 22, 2018 and Sep 7, 2018. 32 other organizations filed here. The comment window closed 2831d ago.

What Environmental Defense Fund filed (5)

Sep 7, 2018· Comment submitted by David Lyon, Scientist, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF)· EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0216-0678

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

May 23, 2018· Mass comment campaign sponsored by Environmental Defense Fund (EDF). Sample attached (email)· EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0216-0669

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

Apr 25, 2018· Mass Comment Campaign sponsored by Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) (web)· EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0216-0572

To Whom It May Concern: Attached, please find the signatures of 38,573 Environmental Defense Fund supporters from across the country who have submitted comments opposing EPA's Notice of Proposed Withdrawal of the Control Techniques Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry under Docket ID EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0216. The comment they each submitted reads: I'm writing seriously concerned over the EPA's decision to roll back Control Techniques Guidelines that help state, local, and tribal air quality agencies set standards for reducing air pollution emissions from oil and gas industry sources that contribute to smog formation. The oil and gas industry is the leading man-made source of Volatile Organic Compounds, which are a key component of ground-level ozone, or smog. This dangerous air pollutant puts Americans at risk and can lead to an early death from respiratory disease. Research has found that smog pollution from the oil and gas industry could lead to an additional 750,000 summertime childhood asthma attacks across the country every year. Without CTGs providing a baseline, communities would have fewer protections from this harmful air pollution and 25 million people will be at increased risk for air pollution. They deserve the protections that the EPA is supposed to guarantee. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns about this submission. Thank you for your consideration, Heather Shelby Manager, Grassroots Organizing & Activism Environmental Defense Fund hshelby@edf.org (202) 572 3242

Apr 25, 2018· Comment submitted by Samantha Caravello, Environmental Defense Fund et al.· EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0216-0630

Environmental Defense Fund, Center for Biological Diversity, Clean Air Task Force, Earthjustice, Environmental Integrity Project, Environmental Law and Policy Center, National Parks Conservation Association, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Sierra Club submit the attached comment letter on EPA's Proposed Withdrawal of the Control Techniques Guidelines. We also submit four volumes of attachments. The following documents are attached: 1. Attachment1_Comments on Proposed Withdrawal 2. Attachment2_Attachments Volume 1 3. Attachment3_Attachments Volume 2 4. Attachment4_Attachments Volume 3 5. Attachment5_Attachments Volume 4

Mar 22, 2018· Mass comment campaign sponsored by Environmental Defense Fund (EDF). Sample attached (email)· EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0216-0371

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

Abstract

Oil and natural gas production is a significant source of ozone-forming volatile organic compounds. EPA’s regulations to reduce emissions from the oil and natural gas industry generally do not address existing sources. This Control Techniques Guideline will extend control measures from the Oil and Natural Gas New Source Performance Standards to existing sources.

View on regulations.gov →
Control Techniques Guideline for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry (EPA) — Environmental Defense Fund | OpenPolis