← Environmental Defense Fund
EPARulemakingEPA-HQ-OAR-2017-0757

Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources Review

RIN
—
Last modified
May 23, 2022
Comment window
closed 2437d ago
Environmental Defense Fund filings
9

Activity

Environmental Defense Fund filed 9 comments on this docket between Dec 4, 2019 and Jul 28, 2020. 59 other organizations filed here. The comment window closed 2437d ago.

What Environmental Defense Fund filed (9)

Jul 28, 2020· Comment submitted by Jessica Christy, Attorney, Oil and Gas, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) (Supplemental Comments)· EPA-HQ-OAR-2017-0757-2675

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

View on regulations.gov →
Jul 24, 2020· Supplemental Comments submitted by Rosalie Winn, Senior Attorney, U.S. Clean Air, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF)· EPA-HQ-OAR-2017-0757-2674

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

View on regulations.gov →
Jun 4, 2020· Comment submitted by Rosalie Winn, Senior Attorney, , U.S. Clean Air, Environmental Defense Fund· EPA-HQ-OAR-2017-0757-2670

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

View on regulations.gov →
Apr 20, 2020· Comment submitted by Rosalie Winn et al.,Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) et al. (Supplemental Comment)· EPA-HQ-OAR-2017-0757-2669

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

View on regulations.gov →
Jan 13, 2020· Comment submitted by Rosalie Winn, Attorney, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF)· EPA-HQ-OAR-2017-0757-2656

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

View on regulations.gov →
Jan 13, 2020· Comment submitted by Rosalie Winn, Attorney, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF)· EPA-HQ-OAR-2017-0757-2657

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

View on regulations.gov →
Dec 5, 2019· Comment submitted by Susanne Brooks, Director, U.S. Climate Policy and Analysis, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) et al.· EPA-HQ-OAR-2017-0757-2201

The Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law respectfully submits the attached comments (along with enclosed references) on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund, the Institute for Policy Integrity, the Montana Environmental Information Center, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Sierra Club, and the Union of Concerned Scientists.

View on regulations.gov →
Dec 4, 2019· Comment submitted by Rosalie Winn et al., Environmental Defense Fund, et al.· EPA-HQ-OAR-2017-0757-2134

We submit the attached comments on behalf of Clean Air Council, Clean Air Task Force, Center for Biological Diversity, Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Earthjustice, Earthworks, Environmental Defense Fund, Environmental Integrity Project, Environmental Law and Policy Center, Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, National Parks Conservation Association, Columbia Riverkeeper, and Waterkeeper Alliance (together, "Joint Environmental Commenters"). Joint Environmental Commenters' comments are informed by the urgent need to reduce emissions of methane and other harmful pollutants from the U.S. oil and natural gas sector. Based on this critical scientific imperative, the Joint Environmental Commenters strongly oppose EPA's illegal and unauthorized proposed revisions to the new source performance standards for the oil and gas sector.

View on regulations.gov →
Dec 4, 2019· Mass Comment Campaign sponsored by Environmental Defense Fund. (web)· EPA-HQ-OAR-2017-0757-2101

To Whom It May Concern, Attached, please find the signatures of 50,641 Environmental Defense Fund supporters from across the country who have submitted electronic comments in opposition to EPA's Proposed Rule: "Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources Review." The comment they each submitted reads: "I am writing today extremely disappointed in -- and in extreme opposition to -- the EPA's proposal to completely eliminate limits on methane pollution from the oil & gas industry. "Giving industry a free pass to pollute isn't good for our health, safety, or economy. It will push us closer to the brink of the climate crisis, and it even goes against what some of the biggest players in the industry -- including Shell, BP, and ExxonMobil -- have asked of you. "There is an entire methane mitigation industry ready to step up and tackle this challenge. It is simply irresponsible to undermine their progress -- and the oil and gas industry's call to action -- in a way that puts Americans at risk. "Please strongly reconsider this decision, and walk back this dangerous proposal." If you have any questions or concerns about this submission, please let me know. Sincerely, Heather Shelby Manager, Grassroots Organizing & Activism Environmental Defense Fund hshelby@edf.org

View on regulations.gov →

Abstract

Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources Reconsideration

View on regulations.gov →

Co-filers (59)

See everyone who commented →