Environmental Defense Fund
EPANonrulemakingEPA-HQ-OPPT-2015-0081

TSCA Work Plan Chemical Problem Formulation of Cyclic Aliphatic Bromides/ Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) Cluster

RIN
Last modified
Apr 16, 2024
Comment window
closed 3905d ago
Environmental Defense Fund filings
2

Activity

Environmental Defense Fund filed 2 comments on this docket between Nov 20, 2015 and Mar 18, 2016. 7 other organizations filed here. The comment window closed 3905d ago.

What Environmental Defense Fund filed (2)

Mar 18, 2016· Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) Comments· EPA-HQ-OPPT-2015-0081-0026

Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) strongly supports EPA's efforts to assess chemicals through the TSCA Work Plan Chemical Program, including several clusters of flame retardant chemicals. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Problem Formulation and Data Needs Assessment and related documents for the Brominated Phthalates Cluster (BPC).

Nov 20, 2015· Comment submitted by Lindsay A. McCormick, Research Analyst et al., Environmental Defense Fund (EDF)· EPA-HQ-OPPT-2015-0081-0015

Please find attached Environmental Defense Fund's comments on the TSCA Work Plan Chemical Problem Formulation and Initial Assessment for the Cyclic Aliphatic Bromides Cluster Flame Retardants.

Abstract

During scoping of this assessment’s TSCA related uses, exposures and hazards were identified for Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD; CASRN 25637-99-4), 1,2,5,6,9,10-Hexabromocyclododecane (1,2,5,6,9,10-HBCD; CASRN 3194-55-6), and 1,2,5,6-Tetrabromocyclooctane (CASRN 3194-57-8). This Problem Formulation Assessment describes the TSCA related uses that were evaluated for inclusion and exclusion in this assessment. This problem formulation includes the conceptual model and the analysis plan for evaluating those uses for HBCD.

View on regulations.gov →