Environmental Defense Fund
EPANonrulemakingEPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0735

HBCD (Hexabromocyclododecane) or Cyclic Aliphatic Bromide Cluster; TSCA Review and Risk Evaluation

RIN
Last modified
May 21, 2026
Comment window
closed 2903d ago
Environmental Defense Fund filings
3

Activity

Environmental Defense Fund filed 3 comments on this docket between Mar 22, 2017 and Sep 10, 2018. 24 other organizations filed here. The comment window closed 2903d ago.

What Environmental Defense Fund filed (3)

Sep 10, 2018· Comment submitted by Stephanie Schwarz, Legal Fellow on behalf of Environmental Defense Fund (EDF)· EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0735-0085

Comments submitted by Stephanie Schwarz, Legal Fellow, on behalf of Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) on Problem Formulations for Risk Evaluations To Be Conducted Under Toxic Substances Control Act. Attached are three documents: Attachment 1: EDF comments on the Ten Problem Formulations Attachment 2: Petitioners Opening Brief challenging EPAs Prioritization and Risk Evaluation Rules (this is Appendix A to Attachment 1) Attachment 3: List of Final and Proposed Superfund Sites (this is Appendix B to Attachment 1)

Sep 26, 2017· Comment submitted by Robert Stockman, Senior Attorney, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF)· EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0735-0064

Comments submitted by Robert Stockman, Senior Attorney, on behalf of Environmental Defense Fund

Mar 22, 2017· Comment submitted by Lindsay McCormick, Chemicals and Health Project Manager, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF)· EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0735-0019

Comments on TSCA Review and Scoping on the first 10 chemicals submitted by Lindsay McCormick, Chemicals and Health Project Manager, on behalf of Environmental Defense Fund.

Abstract

The EPA has prioritized chemicals for risk evaluation to address risks of injury to health and the environment, including HBCD (CASRNs 25637-98-4; 3194-55-6; and 3194-57-8). The EPA is requesting any information from the public on HBCD both domestically and internationally.

View on regulations.gov →