Environmental Defense Fund filed 4 comments on this docket between Mar 23, 2017 and Aug 9, 2022. 36 other organizations filed here. The comment window closed 1454d ago.
Please see the attached comments from Environmental Defense Fund on EPA's draft revision to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) risk determination for methylene chloride.
Comments submitted by Lindsay McCormick, Project Manager, Chemicals and Health, on behalf of Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) on Problem Formulations for Risk Evaluations To Be Conducted Under Toxic Substances Control Act. Attached are three documents: Attachment 1: EDF comments on the Ten Problem Formulations Attachment 2: Petitioners Opening Brief challenging EPAs Prioritization and Risk Evaluation Rules (this is Appendix A to Attachment 1) Attachment 3: List of Final and Proposed Superfund Sites (this is Appendix B to Attachment 1)
Comments submitted by Robert Stockman, Senior Attorney, on behalf of Environmental Defense Fund
Please find attached comments on TSCA Review and Scoping on the first 10 chemicals submitted by Lindsay McCormick, Chemicals and Health Project Manager, on behalf of Environmental Defense Fund.
The EPA has prioritized chemicals for risk evaluation to address risks of injury to health and the environment, including methylene chloride (CASRN 75-09-2). The EPA is requesting any information from the public on methylene chloride both domestically and internationally.
View on regulations.gov →