Please find attached comments submitted on behalf of Environmental Defense Fund to on EPA's Draft TSCA Screening Level Approach for Assessing Ambient Air and Water Exposures to Fenceline Communities.
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) - Fenceline Analysis Approach for Risk Evaluation
Activity
Environmental Defense Fund filed 8 comments on this docket between Dec 29, 2021 and Mar 24, 2022. 14 other organizations filed here. The comment window closed 1589d ago.
What Environmental Defense Fund filed (8)
Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.
Please find attached oral comments I provided at the March 15th SACC Meeting on behalf of Environmental Defense Fund on EPA's draft fenceline screening approach.
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Screening Exposures to Fenceline Communities Docket: EPA-OPPT-2021-0415 Thank you for taking an important step to protect those who live in fenceline communities from toxic chemicals. As a concerned individual, however, I am writing to ask you to do more to protect our communities as the agency carries out the Biden Administration's commitment to prioritize environmental justice and "hold polluters accountable, including those who disproportionately harm communities of color and low-income communities." Communities near industrial facilities are often exposed to multiple toxic chemicals and other stressors simultaneously, exacerbating harmful health effects, like cancer and infertility and asthma. EPA's own data shows that industrial facilities that emit high-risk chemicals are often clustered together with other polluting facilities, further exposing nearby neighborhoods. The Toxic Substances Control Act requires EPA to consider risks to "potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulations" who face greater risk of health effects from chemicals. Fenceline communities clearly meet these criteria. I urge EPA to fully deliver on the promises of the Biden administration and Administrator Regan. To do so, EPA should: 1. Comprehensively evaluate chemical risks to fenceline communities, including potential exposures through waste, groundwater, and from accidental releases; 2. Consider the impact on communities located near multiple manufacturing or disposal facilities; and 3. Evaluate the combined risks of chemicals that pose the same type of harm, like asthma or cancer, to a community. I look forward to your response.
Please find attached comments submitted on behalf of Environmental Defense Fund to the SACC on EPA's Draft TSCA Screening Level Approach for Assessing Ambient Air and Water Exposures to Fenceline Communities.
Environmental Defense Fund requests an extension of the comment period on the screening level approach for assessing air and water exposure to fenceline communities under the Toxic Substances Control Act.
Please find attached comments submitted on behalf of Environmental Defense Fund on Candidates Under Consideration for Selection as ad hoc Reviewers for Draft TSCA Screening Level Approach for Assessing Ambient Air and Water Exposures to Fenceline Communities.
Environmental Defense Fund submits this request that EPA extend by 15 days the public comment period on the candidates under consideration to assist the Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals with the review of the Toxic Substances Control Act screening-level approach for assessing certain exposures to fenceline communities.
Abstract
The TSCA Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) will review and comment on the fenceline analysis approach for Risk Evaluation
View on regulations.gov →Co-filers (14)
See everyone who commented →- Environmental Defense FundTHIS ORG8 filings · confidence 97%
- American Petroleum Institutetrade assoc.4 filings · confidence 97%
- American Chemistry Counciltrade assoc.3 filings · confidence 97%
- National Tribal Toxics Counciltrade assoc.2 filings · confidence 85%
- U.S. Chamber of Commerce2 filings · confidence 97%
- 3M Companyunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- American Coatings Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 97%
- American Composites Manufacturers Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Foundation Medicinetrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Lithium Ion Cell Manufacturers' Coalitiontrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Louisiana Chemical Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)trade assoc.1 filing · confidence 97%
- The Great Neck Breast Cancer Coalitiontrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- University of Californiaunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- University of California San Franciscounverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%