← Environmental Defense Fund
EPARulemakingEPA-HQ-OW-2017-0300

National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Lead and Copper Rule Revisions

RIN
—
Last modified
Dec 28, 2023
Comment window
closed 911d ago
Environmental Defense Fund filings
7

Activity

Environmental Defense Fund filed 7 comments on this docket between Nov 18, 2019 and Feb 21, 2020. 95 other organizations filed here. The comment window closed 911d ago.

What Environmental Defense Fund filed (7)

Feb 21, 2020· Comment submitted by Tom Neltner, Chemicals Policy Director, and Sam Lovell, Project Manager, Health Program, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF)· EPA-HQ-OW-2017-0300-1524

Environmental Defense Fund respectfully submits the attached comments regarding our key points on the Environmental Protection Agency's proposed revisions to its Lead and Copper Rule in addition to issues the agency has specifically highlighted for feedback.

View on regulations.gov →
Feb 19, 2020· Comment submitted by Tom Neltner, Chemicals Policy Director, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF)· EPA-HQ-OW-2017-0300-1442

Environmental Defense Fund respectfully submits the following comments regarding the adult cardiovascular disease aspects of the Environmental Protection Agency's proposed revisions to its Lead and Copper Rule.

View on regulations.gov →
Feb 12, 2020· Comment submitted by Tom Neltner and Lindsay McCormick, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) et al.· EPA-HQ-OW-2017-0300-1084

Harvard Law School's Emmett Environmental Law and Policy Clinic, Environmental Defense Fund, and Dr. Karen Baehler of American University respectfully submit these comments regarding the health equity, environmental justice, and civil rights aspects of the Environmental Protection Agency's proposed revisions to its Lead and Copper Rule.

View on regulations.gov →
Feb 11, 2020· Comment submitted by Lindsay McCormick, Program Manager, Chemicals and Health, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) et al.· EPA-HQ-OW-2017-0300-1011

Please find attached comments from Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) on the proposed revisions to the Lead and Copper Rule. These comments focus specifically on the proposed schools and child care testing provisions. We will address other issues in separate comments We have also attached a 2018 EDF report, "Putting children first: Tackling lead in water at child care facilities."

View on regulations.gov →
Jan 23, 2020· Comment submitted by Lindsay McCormick, Program Manager, Chemicals and Health Program, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF)· EPA-HQ-OW-2017-0300-0984

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

View on regulations.gov →
Dec 19, 2019· Comment submitted by Tom Neltner, JD, Chemicals Policy Director, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) et al.· EPA-HQ-OW-2017-0300-0939

Please find attached comments from Environmental Defense Fund on the proposed revisions to the Lead and Copper Rule. These comments focus on changes that EPA should make to the: - Definition of a lead service line (LSL), - Requirements for water systems to develop LSL inventories, and - Notification of individual consumers who are drinking water that passes through an LSL. We will address other issues in separate comments. Also attached are two referenced studies on disclosure of LSLs (Hang et al., 2019 and Hiltner et al., 2019).

View on regulations.gov →
Nov 18, 2019· Comment submitted by Tom Neltner, Chemicals Policy Director, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF)· EPA-HQ-OW-2017-0300-0857

See attached request for a 60-day extension to public comment period.

View on regulations.gov →

Abstract

The objective to the long-term revisions to the Lead and Copper Rule is to improve public health protection while ensuring effective implementation.

View on regulations.gov →

Co-filers (95)

See everyone who commented →