League of Women Voters
USCISRulemakingUSCIS-2010-0012

Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds

RIN
Last modified
Feb 1, 2024
Comment window
closed 2787d ago
League of Women Voters filings
5

Activity

League of Women Voters filed 5 comments on this docket between Oct 18, 2018 and Jan 31, 2019. 733 other organizations filed here. The comment window closed 2787d ago.

What League of Women Voters filed (5)

Jan 31, 2019· Comment Submitted by Bonny Cox, League of Women Voters of Illinois· USCIS-2010-0012-27101

The League of Women Voters of Illinois strongly opposes the proposed Public Charge Rule changes because they would Increase fear and anxiety and create confusion in immigrant communities. Result in parents and children forgoing critical assistance for fear of being targeted for deportation, putting them at greater risk of falling into poverty. Effectively create an income test for legal permanent resident applicants. Prevent family reunification. If these rule changes move forward, they will have negative ripple effects on the health, development, and economic outcomes in our country for generations to come.

Jan 28, 2019· Comment Submitted by Lori Thiel, League of Women Voters, San Diego· USCIS-2010-0012-25643

The proposed changes to Public Charge for people going through the legal process of seeking a green card is not only discriminatory but harmful to the economy, society, and health of our whole nation. Denying people proper healthcare will result in: poor natal care resulting in some premature births and more children with disabilities excessive use of emergency rooms, which will increase costs for paying patients a transfer of diseases carried into the general population, workplaces and schools need for increased treatment for chronic diseases and disabilities Denying people affordable housing will result in: more people who are evicted and homeless, which the local government must service dysfunctional society as the number of displaced people swell Denying people enough food will result in: people with compromised physical, mental and emotional health who will need care despair, death and disease Please reconsider this change in light of its negative long-term effects.

Dec 6, 2018· Comment Submitted by Arlis Olson, League of Women Voters· USCIS-2010-0012-15790

The administration has proposed a new regulation that would block immigrant families from having a permanent, secure future in the United States. Under the new rule, immigrants who legally access health care, safe housing, and healthy food programs could be denied admission to the country or refused a green card. The proposed rule also makes clear that earning low wages, having children, or dealing with a medical condition could be held against immigrants seeking a permanent future in the United States. This policy will lead to more poverty, hunger, unmet health needs, & racial disparities. Our communities don't need that kind of help from new federal regulations. But it's what would happen under the draft federal "public charge" rule. All of us, regardless of where we were born, suffer when immigrants are penalized for trying to meet their basic needs & paying for them with their tax dollars. Harming immigrants hurts families and communities. We won't build a stronger nation by weakening the families who live in it.

Oct 26, 2018· Comment Submitted by Julie Niles, League of Women Voters Illinois· USCIS-2010-0012-5540

Re:DHS Docket No. USCIS-2010-0012 Opposition to the changes to the Public Charge Rule, "Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds. I am writing to urge the Department of Homeland Security to immediately withdraw the "public charge" proposed rule. The policy will harm millions by undermining access to essential health, nutrition and shelter for immigrants and their families. If this rule moves forward, no longer would we serve as a beacon for the world's dreamers and strivers, Instead, America's doors will be open only to the highest bidder. This proposal is a step backward, not forward, in creating a more perfect union. THIS ISSUE IS IMPORTANT TO ME BECAUSE: Im the granddaughter of immigrants who came here with only what they could carry. They worked hard, raised children who fought in World War II and the Korean War on behalf of the USA, and had grandchildren whove graduated from college and are productive tax-paying citizens. My story has been replicated by millions of immigrants who came here, set up home, set up shops, raised families, paid taxes, and built this country. People from other countries come here for a better life and we all benefit from their dreams. We are all richer from their sharing of their culture, intellect, and hard work. Please immediately withdraw the "public charge" proposed rule. Respectfully, Julie Niles Member of the League of Women Voters Naperville, Illinois Naperville, IL 60564 Jniles14@gmail.com

Oct 18, 2018· Comment Submitted by Meredith Machen, League of Women Voters of New Mexico· USCIS-2010-0012-2709

The League of Women Voters of New Mexico opposes the Department of Homeland Securitys proposed regulations on "public charge. The proposed policy unfairly affects immigrant families who have legally accessed health care, nutrition and housing programs or do so currently. If approved, thousands of individuals who are in the lengthy, bureaucratic process of acquiring their green cards will be denied the right to pursue legal status because of these retro-active provisions. While we disagree with what might become very austere NEW regulations because they will hurt millions of people who want to become Americans, we do understand the need for some sensible FUTURE restrictions. Please remove all retro-active proposed provisions and please remember that the focus of DHS is literally Homeland Security not criminalizing poor individuals and families who supply valuable economic benefits to our country through their hard work. Please reduce the enormous obstacles to legalization and the path to citizenship. Otherwise, more people will be forced to live in the shadows, fearing for their very existence. Thank you! Meredith Machen, Immigration Chair, leaders@lwvnm.org.

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) proposes to prescribe how it determines whether an alien is inadmissible to the United States under section 212(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) because he or she is likely at any time to become a public charge. Aliens who seek adjustment of status or a visa, or who are applicants for admission, must establish that they are not likely at any time to become a public charge, unless Congress has expressly exempted them from this ground of inadmissibility or has otherwise permitted them to seek a waiver of inadmissibility. Moreover, DHS proposes to require all aliens seeking an extension of stay or change of status to demonstrate that they have not received, are not currently receiving, nor are likely to receive, public benefits as defined in the proposed rule.

View on regulations.gov →
Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds (USCIS) — League of Women Voters | OpenPolis