Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)
EPANonrulemakingEPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0920

Dinotefuran Registration Review

RIN
Last modified
Nov 8, 2023
Comment window
closed 2231d ago
Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) filings
6

Activity

Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) filed 6 comments on this docket between Aug 24, 2017 and Dec 29, 2020. 61 other organizations filed here. The comment window closed 2231d ago.

What Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) filed (6)

Dec 29, 2020· Comment submitted by Lucas Rhoads and Daniel Raichel, Staff Attorney, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Margaret Reeves, Senior Scientist, Environmental Health and Workers’ Rights, Pesticide Action Network North America and Bruce Hamilton, National Policy Director, Sierra Club· EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0920-0897

See attached comments on behalf of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Pesticide Action Network North America, and Sierra Club as well as the attached petition and comment on behalf of NRDC.

Jul 22, 2020· Comment submitted by Lucas Rhoads, Staff Attorney, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)· EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0920-0886

Attached are Supplemental Comments submitted on behalf of the Natural Resources Defense Council. These comments supplement those submitted by NRDC, Sierra Club, and Pollinator Action Network North America on May 4, 2020, as well as the comments and petition submitted by NRDC on that date. Both previous comments are attached for reference. As indicated in our May 4th submission, we request that all attached documents are included in the record for all five neonics: Imidacloprid (EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0844); Thiamethoxam (EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0581); Clothianidin; (EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0865); Acetamiprid (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0329); and Dinotefuran (EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0920). Thank you for your consideration.

Jul 17, 2020· Mass comment campaign sponsored by Natural Resources Defense Council (Web)( 33,373 Petition)· EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0920-0881

Please kindly accept these "33,772" public comments from online members and activists of the Natural Resources Defense Council, requesting to restrict the use of neonic pesticides, specifically with regard to the registration review of these 5 chemicals: Acetamprid, Case Number 7617 Clothianidin, Case Number 7620 Dinotefuran, Case Number 7441 Imidacloprid, Case Number 7605 Thiamethoxam, Case Number 7641 We are writing to urge you to commit to protecting pollinators and other wildlife, our food supply, and our health by restricting the use of highly bee-toxic neonic pesticides. Neonics don't just put our bees and the food systems they sustain in danger. The agency's own scientific assessments recognize that neonics also frequently contaminate waters like rivers, lakes, and wetlands, posing serious risks to aquatic life. And scientific research shows that they may increase the risk of permanent developmental or neurological damage in infants and young people. Your proposal to greenlight continued, widespread use of neonics on a huge variety of crops, lawns, gardens, and more, puts our pollinating bees, our food supply, our environment, and our health at continued risk. You have an obligation to uphold the mission of the EPA by doing what's best for bees and people - not what's most profitable for agrochemical companies. We urge you to correct course and take the actions needed to protect our environment - and our health - from neonics. Thank you for your consideration.

Jul 17, 2020· Mass Comment Campaign Sponsored by Natural Resources Defense Council (web) (8,882 comments)· EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0920-0884

Dear EPA Administrator Wheeler, Please kindly accept these 8,882 public comments from online members and activists of the Natural Resources Defense Council, in addition to the 24,797 public comments previously submitted on May 4, 2020, requesting to restrict the use of neonic pesticides, specifically with regard to the registration review of these 5 chemicals: Acetamiprid, Case Number 7617 Clothianidin, Case Number 7620 Dinotefuran, Case Number 7441 Imidacloprid, Case Number 7605 Thiamethoxam, Case Number 7641 We are writing to urge you to commit to protecting pollinators and other wildlife, our food supply, and our health by restricting the use of highly bee-toxic neonic pesticides. Neonics don't just put our bees and the food systems they sustain in danger. Peer-reviewed research and the agency's own scientific assessments recognize that neonics also frequently contaminate waters like rivers, lakes, and wetlands, posing serious risks to aquatic life. And scientific research shows that they may increase the risk of permanent developmental or neurological damage in infants and children. Your proposal to greenlight continued, widespread use of neonics on a huge variety of crops, lawns, gardens, and more, puts our pollinating bees, our food supply, our environment, and our health at continued risk. You have an obligation to uphold the mission of the EPA by doing what's best for bees and people - not what's most profitable for agrochemical companies. We urge you to correct course and take the actions needed to protect our environment - and our health - from neonics. Thank you for your consideration.

Jul 8, 2019· Comment submitted by Lucas J. Rhoads, Staff Attorney, Nature Program on behalf of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)· EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0920-0756

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

Aug 24, 2017· Comment submitted by Jennifer Sass, PhD, Senior Scientist, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)· EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0920-0613

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

Abstract

For further information contact: Katherine Atha (202) 566-1933

View on regulations.gov →