Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)
EPANonrulemakingEPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0737

Trichloroethylene; TSCA Review and Risk Evaluation

RIN
Last modified
May 29, 2026
Comment window
closed 1450d ago
Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) filings
6

Activity

Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) filed 6 comments on this docket between Feb 6, 2017 and Aug 10, 2022. 36 other organizations filed here. The comment window closed 1450d ago.

What Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) filed (6)

Aug 10, 2022· Comment submitted by Safer Chemicals Healthy Families (SCHF), Earthjustice and Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)· EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0737-0144

Safer Chemicals Healthy Families, Earthjustice and Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) submit the attached comments on the July 5, 2022 notice of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announcing the availability of a draft revision to the December 2020 risk evaluation for Trichloroethylene (TCE) under section 6(b) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The draft revised risk determination for TCE is based on two important changes in how EPA conducts risk evaluations under section 6(b) of TSCA: •EPA proposes to "determine that TCE, as a whole chemical, presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health when evaluated under its conditions of use." As the notice explains, EPA believes its "risk determination for TCE is better characterized as a whole chemical risk determination rather than condition-of-use-specific risk determinations." Accordingly, EPA would revise and replace section 5 of the risk evaluation for TCE, which makes findings of unreasonable risk "for the individual conditions of use evaluated." EPA would also withdraw its previous order under section 6(i)(I) of TSCA determining that 2 TCE conditions of use do not present unreasonable risks. 87 Fed. Reg. at 40521. •EPA proposes to modify EPA's determination of unreasonable risk to workers so it no longer reflects an "assumption that all workers always appropriately wear personal protective equipment (PPE)." For TCE and other chemicals, determinations of unreasonable risk to workers would instead be made "from a baseline scenario that does not assume compliance with OSHA standards, including any applicable exposure limits or requirements for use of respiratory protection or other PPE" Instead, "information on the use of PPE as a means of mitigating risk . . . would be considered during the risk management phase as appropriate." 87 Fed. Reg. at 39828. EPA earlier proposed to apply these approaches to its risk evaluation for the Cyclic Aliphatic Bromide Cluster (HBCD). 86 Fed. Reg. 74082 (December 29, 2021). In our comments, we agreed that EPA should replace use-by-use approaches with whole chemical risk determinations and evaluate risks to workers without unsupportable assumptions about the effectiveness of PPE. We also urged EPA to embrace and apply the whole chemical approach more expansively. On June 29, 2022, EPA finalized its revised risk determination for HBCD in accordance with its proposal and rejected legal and policy challenges by industry stakeholders. 87 Fed. Reg. 40524. Building on its final action on HBCD, EPA has now proposed to adopt the same approach for TCE and several other substances subject to its initial risk evaluations. Our groups support these new proposals. Below, we reiterate our earlier recommendations to strengthen the whole chemical approach and urge EPA to incorporate key elements of the analysis supporting its final revised risk determination for HBCD. We also reiterate why EPA should make no assumptions about the effectiveness of PPE use in its risk determinations and rebut industry objections to EPA's approach to worker protection under TSCA.

Jul 18, 2018· Comment submitted by Eve C. Gartner, Senior Attorney, Earthjustice, Robert Stockman, Senior Attorney, Environmental Defense Fund, Daniel Rosenberg, Senior Attorney, Natural Resources Defense Council, Liz Hitchcock, Acting Director, Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families· EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0737-0088

Attached please find a request for extension of the comment periods on the ten Problem Formulations for Risk Evaluations To Be Conducted Under Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), and on the General Guiding Principles To Apply Systematic Review in TSCA Risk Evaluations, submitted by Earthjustice, Environmental Defense Fund, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Safer Chemicals Healthy Families. The comment periods for all of these complex documents are set to end on July 26, 2018, a time period this is simply inadequate to providing meaningful review and comment for the reasons set out in the attached letter. We request an extension for a minimum of 46 days. With a 46-day extension, the comment period would close on Monday, September 10, 2018.

Sep 26, 2017· Comment submitted by Jennifer Sass, PhD, Senior Scientist, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)· EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0737-0073

NRDC comments attached

Mar 21, 2017· Comment submitted by Jennifer Sass, Ph.D., Senior Scientist, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)· EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0737-0020

Comments from the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) on the TSCA Review and Scoping for Tetrachloroethylene (PERC, CAS# 127-18-4) and Trichloroethylene (TCE, CAS# 79-01-6)

Mar 2, 2017· Mass Comment Campaign sponsored by Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). Sample attached (paper)· EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0737-0004

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

Feb 6, 2017· Comment submitted by Eve Gartner, Staff Attorney, Earthjustice, Elizabeth Hitchcock, Legislative Director, Safer Chemicals Healthy Families (SCHF), Daniel Rosenberg, Senior Attorney, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Mike Belliveau, Executive Director, Environmental Health Strategy Center (EHSC)· EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0737-0002

Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families, Earthjustice, the Natural Resources Defense Council, and Environmental Health Strategy Center submit this letter to request that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency extend the public comment period to April 15, 2017 for receiving input and information to assist the Agency in its efforts to establish the scope of risk evaluations for the ten chemical substances designated on December 19, 2016 pursuant to the Toxic Substances Control Act.

Abstract

The EPA has prioritized chemicals for risk evaluation to address risks of injury to health and the environment, including trichloroethylene. The EPA is requesting any information from the public on trichloroethylene both domestically and internationally.

View on regulations.gov →