Safer Chemicals Healthy Families, Earthjustice and Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) submit the attached comments on the July 5, 2022 notice of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announcing the availability of a draft revision to the December 2020 risk evaluation for Trichloroethylene (TCE) under section 6(b) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The draft revised risk determination for TCE is based on two important changes in how EPA conducts risk evaluations under section 6(b) of TSCA: •EPA proposes to "determine that TCE, as a whole chemical, presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health when evaluated under its conditions of use." As the notice explains, EPA believes its "risk determination for TCE is better characterized as a whole chemical risk determination rather than condition-of-use-specific risk determinations." Accordingly, EPA would revise and replace section 5 of the risk evaluation for TCE, which makes findings of unreasonable risk "for the individual conditions of use evaluated." EPA would also withdraw its previous order under section 6(i)(I) of TSCA determining that 2 TCE conditions of use do not present unreasonable risks. 87 Fed. Reg. at 40521. •EPA proposes to modify EPA's determination of unreasonable risk to workers so it no longer reflects an "assumption that all workers always appropriately wear personal protective equipment (PPE)." For TCE and other chemicals, determinations of unreasonable risk to workers would instead be made "from a baseline scenario that does not assume compliance with OSHA standards, including any applicable exposure limits or requirements for use of respiratory protection or other PPE" Instead, "information on the use of PPE as a means of mitigating risk . . . would be considered during the risk management phase as appropriate." 87 Fed. Reg. at 39828. EPA earlier proposed to apply these approaches to its risk evaluation for the Cyclic Aliphatic Bromide Cluster (HBCD). 86 Fed. Reg. 74082 (December 29, 2021). In our comments, we agreed that EPA should replace use-by-use approaches with whole chemical risk determinations and evaluate risks to workers without unsupportable assumptions about the effectiveness of PPE. We also urged EPA to embrace and apply the whole chemical approach more expansively. On June 29, 2022, EPA finalized its revised risk determination for HBCD in accordance with its proposal and rejected legal and policy challenges by industry stakeholders. 87 Fed. Reg. 40524. Building on its final action on HBCD, EPA has now proposed to adopt the same approach for TCE and several other substances subject to its initial risk evaluations. Our groups support these new proposals. Below, we reiterate our earlier recommendations to strengthen the whole chemical approach and urge EPA to incorporate key elements of the analysis supporting its final revised risk determination for HBCD. We also reiterate why EPA should make no assumptions about the effectiveness of PPE use in its risk determinations and rebut industry objections to EPA's approach to worker protection under TSCA.
Trichloroethylene; TSCA Review and Risk Evaluation
Activity
Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) filed 6 comments on this docket between Feb 6, 2017 and Aug 10, 2022. 36 other organizations filed here. The comment window closed 1450d ago.
What Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) filed (6)
Attached please find a request for extension of the comment periods on the ten Problem Formulations for Risk Evaluations To Be Conducted Under Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), and on the General Guiding Principles To Apply Systematic Review in TSCA Risk Evaluations, submitted by Earthjustice, Environmental Defense Fund, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Safer Chemicals Healthy Families. The comment periods for all of these complex documents are set to end on July 26, 2018, a time period this is simply inadequate to providing meaningful review and comment for the reasons set out in the attached letter. We request an extension for a minimum of 46 days. With a 46-day extension, the comment period would close on Monday, September 10, 2018.
NRDC comments attached
Comments from the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) on the TSCA Review and Scoping for Tetrachloroethylene (PERC, CAS# 127-18-4) and Trichloroethylene (TCE, CAS# 79-01-6)
Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.
Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families, Earthjustice, the Natural Resources Defense Council, and Environmental Health Strategy Center submit this letter to request that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency extend the public comment period to April 15, 2017 for receiving input and information to assist the Agency in its efforts to establish the scope of risk evaluations for the ten chemical substances designated on December 19, 2016 pursuant to the Toxic Substances Control Act.
Abstract
The EPA has prioritized chemicals for risk evaluation to address risks of injury to health and the environment, including trichloroethylene. The EPA is requesting any information from the public on trichloroethylene both domestically and internationally.
View on regulations.gov →Co-filers (36)
See everyone who commented →- Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)THIS ORG6 filings · confidence 97%
- American Chemistry Counciltrade assoc.6 filings · confidence 97%
- Environmental Defense Fundtrade assoc.4 filings · confidence 97%
- Arkema Incunverified attribution3 filings · confidence 70%
- Silent Spring Institutetrade assoc.3 filings · confidence 85%
- University of Californiaunverified attribution3 filings · confidence 70%
- Alliance of Automobile Manufacturerstrade assoc.2 filings · confidence 97%
- American Coatings Associationtrade assoc.2 filings · confidence 97%
- American Public Health Associationtrade assoc.2 filings · confidence 85%
- The Alliance for Responsible Atmospheric Policytrade assoc.2 filings · confidence 85%
- the International Unionunverified attribution2 filings · confidence 70%
- the Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Associationtrade assoc.2 filings · confidence 85%
- U.S. Tire Manufacturers Associationtrade assoc.2 filings · confidence 85%
- Adhesive and Sealant Counciltrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Aerospace Industries Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 97%
- Alkylphenols & Ethoxylates Research Counciltrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Alliance for Automotive Innovationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 97%
- American Forest & Paper Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 97%
- Arnold & Porter on behalf of Chemical Users Coalitiontrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Chemical Users Coalitiontrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- College of Medicineunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Consumer Specialty Products Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Counsel on behalf of Chemical Users Coalitiontrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Environmental Protection Network (EPN)trade assoc.1 filing · confidence 97%
- Halogenated Solvents Industry Alliance Inc.trade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Household & Commercial Products Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 97%
- Learning Disabilities Association of Americatrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Mexichem Fluor Inc.unverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- National Association of Chemical Distributorstrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- National Tribal Toxics Council (NTTC) - includes mass comment campaign (email)trade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- North America's Building Trades Unionunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Ohio Universityunverified attribution1 filing · confidence 70%
- Precision Machined Products Associationtrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Sustainable Furnishings Counciltrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- Toxics Use Reduction Institutetrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%
- U.S. Chamber of Commerce1 filing · confidence 97%
- Vinyl Institutetrade assoc.1 filing · confidence 85%