Renewable Fuels Association
EPANonrulemakingEPA-HQ-OGC-2018-0818

Sierra Club v. Pruitt, No. 1:17-cv-02174-APM (D.D.C.)

RIN
Last modified
Mar 25, 2022
Comment window
closed 2682d ago
Renewable Fuels Association filings
1

Activity

Renewable Fuels Association filed 1 comment on this docket between Mar 28, 2019 and Mar 28, 2019. 1 other organizations filed here. The comment window closed 2682d ago.

What Renewable Fuels Association filed (1)

Mar 28, 2019· Comment submitted by Geoff Cooper, President, Chief Executive Officer, Renewable Fuels Association (RFA)· EPA-HQ-OGC-2018-0818-0009

Filed on regulations.gov — full text not in the inline record.

Abstract

On October 19, 2017, Sierra Club filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, alleging that the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) failed to perform a non-discretionary duty to assess and report to Congress on the environmental and resource conservation impacts of the Energy Independence and Security Act’s (EISA) Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program, failed to complete the required anti-backsliding study to determine whether the vehicle and engine air pollutant emissions changes resulting from the RFS program’s renewable fuel volumes adversely impact air quality, and failed to promulgate fuel regulations to implement appropriate measures to mitigate any such adverse impacts or make a determination that such regulations were unnecessary. The proposed partial consent decree would establish a deadline for EPA to take action on the anti-backsliding study.

View on regulations.gov →
Sierra Club v. Pruitt, No. 1:17-cv-02174-APM (D.D.C.) (EPA) — Renewable Fuels Association | OpenPolis