Animal Welfare Institute
APHISNonrulemakingAPHIS-2024-0024

Semiaquatic Mammal Damage Management in Oregon

RIN
Last modified
Dec 1, 2024
Comment window
closed 781d ago
Animal Welfare Institute filings
1

Activity

Animal Welfare Institute filed 1 comment on this docket between Jun 10, 2024 and Jun 10, 2024. 0 other organizations filed here. The comment window closed 781d ago.

What Animal Welfare Institute filed (1)

Jun 10, 2024· Comment from Animal Welfare Institute· APHIS-2024-0024-8151

Dear Wildlife Services Oregon State Director: The Animal Welfare Institute ("AWI"), on behalf of our members in Oregon, submits these comments on the Pre-Decisional Environmental Assessment ("EA") for the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service ("APHIS"), Wildlife Services' ("Wildlife Services" and "WS-Oregon") Semiaquatic Mammal Damage Management ("SMDM") in Oregon, which targets beaver, mink, nutria, muskrat, and river otter. AWI is a nonprofit organization founded in 1951 whose mission is to alleviate the suffering caused to animals by people. We seek better treatment of animals everywhere—in the wild, in research, in agriculture, in commerce, and in our communities. We advance our mission through strategically crafted political and legal advocacy, educational programs, litigation, research, and engagement with industry, policymakers, scientists, and other NGOs. The EA contains multiple deficiencies that must be rectified to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act ("NEPA"), 42 U.S.C. § 4321, et seq. First, WS-Oregon provided a flawed set of alternatives within the EA, and improperly dismissed multiple reasonable alternatives. Second, the EA fails to take a sufficiently hard look at the ecological benefits of beavers, the inhumaneness of multiple management methods, and the impact on non-target species, including threatened and endangered species. Lastly, the document fails to adequately consider impacts to special areas containing unique resources and habitats, including Wilderness Areas and Wilderness Study Areas. We request that the legal inadequacies identified in this comment be addressed in the final decision document. For a further discussion of these issues, please see the attached comment. Thank you for considering our concerns. If you have any questions or there is any additional information we can provide, please do not hesitate to contact me. Regards, Johanna Hamburger Director and Senior Attorney Terrestrial Wildlife Program Animal Welfare Institute 900 Pennsylvania Ave, SE Washington, DC 20003

Abstract

Wildlife Services (WS), a program within the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), has issued a Decision and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Final Environmental Assessment (EA) titled Semiaquatic Mammal Damage Management in Oregon. The EA analyzed the potential environmental impacts of alternatives for WS’ involvement in semiaquatic mammal damage management. The selected alternative, Alternative 1, allows WS to respond to requests for assistance with an integrated approach that uses a variety of non-lethal and lethal techniques to reduce semiaquatic mammal damage to human safety, agriculture, property, and natural resources in Oregon. Based on the analysis in the Final EA, the FONSI concluded that the selection of Alternative 1 will not cause any significant impacts to the human environment.

View on regulations.gov →
Semiaquatic Mammal Damage Management in Oregon (APHIS) — Animal Welfare Institute | OpenPolis